Happy New Year

We would like to wish all our members, and everybody else in Horsham constituency a Happy New Year in 2011. 

It is likely to be a good year. Unless you are old. Or looking forward to university.  Or fall ill, drive a car, commute by train, lose your job, want to leave home, or buy anything in shops.

Here are a few of the things to look forward to in 2011.

Increased rail fares

The price of regulated fares (like season tickets) rise in January by an average of 6.2%   As that is an average, some fares will rise by even more, with a season ticket from Haywards Heath to London going up by 7.69%

Petrol price rises

If the cost of rail fares makes the car seem tempting, think again because January sees an increase in duty at the same time as the VAT rise.

VAT increases

The rise in VAT does not only affect petrol of course, but nearly everything we buy.  Before the election last year the Tories produced posters that said Labour intended to increase VAT so vote Tory to avoid that, and the Lib Dems produced posters about the “Tory VAT bombshell” saying that the Tories intended to increase VAT so vote Lib Dem to avoid it, and now we have a Tory-led government which has increased VAT by 2.5% , aided and abetted by their Lib Dem partners.

Ed Miliband says that this is the “wrong tax, wrong time” and that:

Today we start to see the Tory-led agenda move from Downing Street to your street. At midnight VAT goes up, hitting people’s living standards, small businesses and jobs. The VAT rise is the most visible example of what we mean when we say the government is going too far and too fast.

VAT is a tax which disproportionately affects those on lower incomes as a larger proportion of their income is spent on goods and services which attract VAT.

Council service cuts

Horsham district council have to set a budget based on a reduction of its formula grant of more than 18% and that is just in cash terms, not taking inflation into account.  Last year the grant from central government was £5.5million, in 2011-12 it will be £4.5million and in 2012-13 it will be £3.9million.

Can £1.6million be taken out of the council’s buget over two years without services being affected?  We don’t think so.  David Cameron said that no frontline services would be affected by his cuts and that any minister who came to him with proposals that would cat frontline services would be asked to go back and think again.  Was Eric Pickles asked to think again?

As we have pointed out before, the Lib Dem opposition on Horsham council do not even propose an alternative to Tory budgets.

And the rest

Even the governments new Orwellian-sounding Office for Budget Responsibility is predicting slowing economic growth, resulting in higher unemployment – leading to £1.5billion higher welfare and benefits bills.  There is a strong probability that interest rates and mortgage rates will rise too affecting homeowners.

Meanwhile, the tax income from companies like Vodafone and individuals like Philip Green that would go a long way to bridging these gaps continues to be uncollected.

Posted in Cuts, Elections, Railways, VAT | Leave a comment

Merry Christmas from Horsham Labour

Horsham Labour party would like to wish everybody a merry Christmas and a very happy New Year and we look forward to seeing you all at the polling stations in May!

Posted in Elections, Horsham Council | Leave a comment

Join for a penny!

The Labour party is encouraging young people to become members by introducing a special rate of one penny for the first year’s membership for anybody under 27.  This is partly in recognition that youn people are one of the groups that will be disproportionately affected by the Tory-led government’s cuts in the future.

People over 27 are also welcome of course.

You can join by following this link.

Posted in Membership | Leave a comment

No opposition on Horsham council

Following the news reports of a £1.6million gap in Horsham council’s finances, the chair of Horsham Labour party wrote a letter to the local papers.

The letter states that the Liberal Democrats councillors on Horsham district council fail to provide an effective opposition to the ruling Tory group, with the result that matters affecting the town of Horsham are decided largely by councillors from outside the town and with no significant scrutiny from councillors who represent the town.

This is the full text of the letter:

It is outrageous that in these straitened economic times incompetent management by the Tory administration has left a £1.6 million hole in the council’s finances.

What is worse is that it would appear from reports in last week’s County Times that the Lib Dems’ inability to provide effective scrutiny or to keep up to speed with council business is partly to blame for this state of affairs.

The Lib Dem Group Leader admits in the article of 25th November (‘Council “are in denial” over scheme costs’) that the scrutiny committee failed to obtain a report into the financing of the Acorn recycling scheme back in July. So not much scrutiny there.

On the letters page another Lib Dem councillor is outraged that she only learned of the Council’s decision to call time on the market traders through the pages of the County Times. The outrage is not only that a councillor is not better informed but also that this is yet another example of the Tory-run Council riding roughshod over the views and wishes of Horsham town residents. (Think town hall, think playschemes, affordable housing, Shelly fountain…)

The Tories’ actions go unchallenged in the council chamber and they clearly have little or no respect for the Lib Dems who, if what I have seen as an observer at district council meetings is anything to go by, they see as struggling to identify how to act as an effective opposition.

Recent ineffectual performance from the Lib Dems includes failing to propose an alternative budget this year despite claiming, in response to Horsham Labour party’s campaign to save the holiday playschemes, that they opposed cuts to funding. And when it came to the biggest housing development within Horsham for a generation and an opportunity to support the Labour party’s campaign to provide more affordable housing for local people, the Lib Dems failed even then to work out where they stood, and failed to vote together as a political group to increase to level of affordable homes.

What Horsham council needs are good, able and strong minded councillors to provide effective scrutiny of all council decisions and expenditure. This would improve the decision making processes and deliver better services and greater value for money for local residents. By so undervaluing the opposition the Tory Council are guilty of running a one party district which is becoming a personal fiefdom for a few individual councillors, all of whom live outside of the town centre.

Surely this can not be allowed to go on. The overall effect of this is a lack of good financial management and lack of delivery of appropriate services for council tax payers.

Posted in Cuts, Horsham Council, Letters, Press cuttings | Leave a comment

Mixed communities at risk as a result of Con-Dem spending cuts

Rare example of affordable
housing within Horsham

By David Hide

The thing that has clearly come out of the Con-Dem government’s spending review is the demonstration of ideological differences displayed by the coalition in respect of housing policy to that of both the previous Labour government and the Labour party here in Horsham.

While Horsham Labour party is on record as supporting increased levels of affordable housing, our local Conservative council has consistently missed its own very meagre targets. While the Labour government was increasing spend on affordable housing, the Lib Dems and Tory coalition has slashed the budget by 50%. While the Labour party believes in supporting and encouraging mixed communities the Coalition government is ready to evict families on housing benefit, creating ghettos where only the rich can afford to live.

The proposed changes to housing benefit have created considerable debate within the media, but make no mistake people will be uprooted from their family homes through no fault of their own, simply because they live within what has become an affluent area. Is it right to attack the recipients of housing benefit in this way? Housing benefit should not be used as a means of disproportionately boosting the bank balances of private landlords. Instead the Government should consider returning to a system of setting ‘fair’ private rents, with the money saved being used to encourage councils such as ours to build social housing.

It is clear that the unaffordable nature of housing goes way beyond those in receipt of housing benefit, when a recent survey undertaken by Shelter and as reported in last week’s paper, identified that an income of £50,000 is needed to buy a home within Horsham District. It is neither fair nor will it be effective to attack those most in need, when looking for solutions to our housing crisis. Far better to consider repealing the ‘right to buy’ legislation and invest in a new generation of affordable social housing which over time would dramatically reduce the need to provide housing benefit to those living in the unregulated private rented sector.

The proposed changes to housing policy are not fair, will not increase the supply of affordable housing, and are centred on attacking those in most need. Here in Horsham it has been clear to the local Labour party that the Tory Council has for a long time been undertaking a policy that has controversially been described as social cleansing, as it has consistently refused to meet even its own inadequate targets for social housing provision.

The Con-Dem government changes to housing policy, if introduced, will mimic what has long been happening within Horsham and sends out the message to many hard working folk that you are welcome to come and work for us within the district but under no account are you welcome to live among us.

Posted in ConDems, Housing | Leave a comment

Lessons not learnt after all?

The snow and ice in Horsham is now beginning to melt but the number one topic mentioned by many residents, was why has the local council yet again failed to grit our pavements and the vast majority of our roads which once more became treacherous to the point that only the brave or foolhardy could venture out to work over the past few days.

Posted in Horsham Council, WSCC | Leave a comment

Horsham old town hall


Horsham Labour Party canvassed residents’ views about the ongoing saga of the old town hall.

We are in favour of retaining the town hall for the community and do not want to see it become yet another restaurant venue, and are appalled by the way our Tory council has handled our community facility.

Labour party members spoke with dozens of local residents living close to the train station and the park. We didn’t come across a single person who was in favour of the council’s proposal of installing yet another restaurant instead of  retaining a community facility.

A couple of people had no strong views either way but the vast majority of local residents supported the idea of developing an enhanced community venue. Are you listening Councillor Baldwin?

One very good idea that a member of Transition Horsham proposed was to turn the old town hall into a Bill’s-style store run by the community for the community. Another person suggested opening up a community post office as it is clear that the current provision within the Carfax is insufficient.

Our campaign co-ordinator, Carol Hayton,has sent this letter into the local paper in support of our position:

Andrew Baldwin accuses the Lib Dems of being economical with the truth (WSCT letters page December 3rd) and then uses statistics that suggest that he is doing exactly the same thing himself.

He counters the claim that the public were ignored when deciding the future of the Town Hall by saying that 76 per cent of respondents to his leaflet agreed that they did not want to spend their hard earned taxpayers money on the renovating the town hall.

What he fails to mention is exactly how many responses he received and, therefore, whether it was 76 percent of 10 or of 1000. The actual number of responses is key to determining how many people actually agreed with Cllr. Baldwin

Cllr. Baldwin also uses the current Tory tactic of claiming that taxpayers do not want their money spent on those things they choose to cut. Let’s face it, no one ever really wants to pay tax and when asked if we want our money spent on anything that we haven’t personally chosen ourselves we will say no, perhaps in the vain hope that we will be able to keep the money. But as Benjamin Franklin said, ‘the only things certain in life are death and taxes‘ and, like it or not, we have to pay.

So perhaps the Tories should take a more honest approach and ask what would we rather have that money spent on. For example; ‘Would you rather have your hard earned money spent on:

  • Renovating the town hall or on a recycling scheme that leaves a massive hole in the council budget?
  • Renovating the town hall or on the vastly expensive pedestrianisation of East street which will no doubt have to be dug up and poorly resurfaced the next time someone has to deal with underground services, as has happened in the Forum?
  • Renovating the town hall or on the expense bill for councillors who make decisions you don’t even agree with?

Members of Horsham Labour party support the campaign for community use of the town hall, we would also like to see our hard earned council tax spent on much needed services for children and the vulnerable, areas that the Tories have decided to cut. We will be writing to Francis Maude and Cllr Baldwin to let them know.
We will keep you posted with their reply. 

Posted in Horsham Council, Letters, Old Town Hall | Leave a comment

Some new web sites

A couple of new websites have started this week that our members and supporters might find interesting. Both sites contain news and details of campaigning events.

UK Uncut

Can be found at www.ukuncut.org.uk
It bills itself as the ‘Big Society Revenue & Customs’ and is there to put pressure on those large companies and wealthy individuals who avoid or evade their taxes.

Its mission statement is:

At the same time as making massive cuts to public services, this government is letting rich individuals and corporations avoid billions of pounds of tax. Join UK Uncut’s Big Society Revenue & Customs (BSRC) and become part of an army of citizen volunteers determined to make wealthy tax avoiders pay. If they won’t chase them, we will

False Economy

Can be found at www.falseeconomy.org.uk
It is based on the premise that the government’s planned cuts are unfair, risk the fragile economic recovery and fail to make those who caused the crash pay a proper contribution through the tax system to clearing up the mess they made.

Posted in Cuts | Leave a comment

Disappointed by Lib Dems

In the local paper last week there were a couple of pages about the increase in student fees, including the opinions of several local politicians, parents and head teachers.

One of these opinion pieces was by Morwen Millson, the leader of the Liberal Democrat group on the county council.

This week the County Times printed a piece by Labour’s Andrew Skudder which is partly a response to that article but also a commentary on the public spending cuts in general.

The full text is below.
(As sent in – not checked for any sub-editing changes)

I can sympathise with Morwen Millson in her disappointment at the Lib Dems nationally. Been there, done that, and got the t-shirt because I have at times been disappointed by some of the things my own party did in government, which seemed to be at odds with what ordinary members thought. It was almost impossible to find a local member in favour of Trident renewal or 42-day detention for example, and the introduction of student fees itself was extremely unpopular with the majority of members, so I can understand her being disappointed.

Reading beyond the headline though, it looks like she is not disappointed at all by the decision to increase tuition fees. She supports that, repeating the constant Con-Dem refrain that it is unavoidable. The only thing she appears to be disappointed by is the decision of her party’s candidates, presumably including the Horsham candidate, to make very public, personal pledges to vote against any increases.

All that has happened here is that Morwen Millson has managed to get a headline that looks like disapproval of the policy to increase fees over the top of a long justification of the increases.

Let us be very clear, the increase in tuition fees, just like the cuts to public services and attacks on the security of social housing tenants is only necessary if you make certain assumptions, like starting from the premise that the deficit and public borrowing must be reduced at a rate most economists would agree will endanger any chance of economic recovery. We have already seen that approach fail in Ireland, and the government’s reaction is to copy the strategy that has already been seen to fail so spectacularly.

The irony is that, after being told that we must reduce police numbers, cut back benefits at the very time they will be most needed, and hack away at council services in the cause of reducing borrowing, the government can increase borrowing by £7bn at the drop of a hat to bail out the Irish economy that they are so keen to emulate.

Another assumption made is that large companies like Vodafone, non-doms and people with millions lodged in Swiss banks should not have to pay all the tax that they are liable for. If you start from an assumption that tax avoidance and evasion should be eliminated you will find that these cuts are avoidable after all and that not only would tuition fee rises be avoidable but perhaps tuition fees themselves would be avoidable.

Whenever I hear that some idealogically-motivated attack on normal working people is ‘unavoidable’ I have to remind myself that is only because the government has chosen to make it unavoidable, and it appears that locally the Lib Dems are as disappointing as they are nationally because they are happy to support this, even if they want to simultaneously appear that they do not.

I really did expect better from the Lib Dems, but I imagine that my disappointment is nothing compared to that of anybody who actually voted for them, especially if their decision was made on the strength of the pledges on tuition fees.

Posted in Cuts, Lib Dems, Student Fees | Leave a comment

The future of the Old Town Hall

With the news last week that Bill’s Produce have pulled out of the deal with Horsham council to buy the Old Town Hall and turn it into another restaurant, the future of the building is now in the balance again.

Public opinion was overwhelmingly in favour of keeping the building as a community resource – a community centre for the centre of the town, and a venue for local performers.

Horsham district council pushed their plans through in the face of much public opposition, making it clear that they had no intention of changing their mind.

Now there is an opportunity to re-visit the decision, with the possibility that this will still be unresolved by the time the council is up for re-election, meaning that perhaps the public will get a chance to make their views known in a way the council has to take notice of – with their ballot papers!

Horsham Labour party’s campaign co-ordinator, Carol Hayton, wrote to the County Times on this subject.  The full text of her letter is as follows:

The decision by Bill’s to pull out of the town hall project gives the council an opportunity to prove that it is working in the interests of the people of Horsham.

A significant number of residents demonstrated in the consultation about the town hall’s future that they wanted to see this building used as a community venue.

The council’s refusal to listen to the views of residents was a costly mistake which it now has the chance to put right. We call upon the Tories running the council to act in the proclaimed spirit of their own government’s pland for a ‘big society’, and allow local people to determine the future of the hall.

In the process they coulc demonstrate that the big society is not morely a smokescreen to conceal an ideologically driven determination to cut back on publicly funded services in favour of initiatives that fill the coffers of business at tax payers’ expense.

The town hall should be handed back to the people of Horsham.  Now is the perfect time to do this as the Big Lottery’s Reaching Communities Capital Grants funding stream has just opened.  This will provide grants of up to £500,000 to transform community buildings.

Surely the councilshould welcome such an initiative which would allow it to retain an important asset for the community at little cost to the tax payer.

I challenge the Tory council to support an appropriate organisation, Blue Flash Music Trust for example, in ensuring that the town hall is used for the purpose that the people of Horsham prefer, with an application for funding, if appropriate, to deliver a modern town centre community venue, a resource we can all be proud of.

Posted in Horsham Council, Old Town Hall | Leave a comment